RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03703
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 11 Nov 11 [sic] be declared
void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System
(AFFMS).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The individual who performed his abdominal circumference (AC)
measurements was assigned to his unit and prior to his FA he [the
applicant] had issued him a Letter of Counseling and a Letter of
Reprimand.
He served as the individuals trainer prior to the individuals
medical withdrawal from his career field.
He was incorrectly measured and when he questioned the individual
he was told the measurements taken were final and could not be
changed by the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) supervisor. He
informed the FAC supervisor that the individual was assigned to
his unit and should not be allowed to measure him. The FAC
supervisor replied that it did not matter.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The member is currently serving in the Regular Air Force. He
failed his FA dated 17 Nov 11.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. On 24 Aug 12, DPSIM requested the
applicant provide additional documentation; specifically, a
signed memorandum from the fitness testing administrators stating
that his abdominal circumference measurements were done
incorrectly, a copy of his signed fitness assessment score sheet
and fitness questionnaire. In addition, it was requested that he
identify which FA failure he was referring to because there was
no FA dated 11 Nov 11. DPSIM notes the requested documents were
not received.
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant clarified that he would like his FA of
17 Nov 11 removed from his records.
He notes the individual who performed the test was formerly under
his supervision and had to discipline him numerous times for
inappropriate behavior. He advised the individual that he should
not conduct his test; however, he was told there was no one else
to do it. The individual refused to provide a letter stating
that he incorrectly performed the measurements.
He does not have access to the requested documents. He has
attached a copy of his AFFMS printout dated 19 Sep 12 which
indicates the name of the individual that performed his AC
measurements.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting
relief. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and
noting the applicant's contentions, we believe that relief is
warranted. While we note DPSIM recommends denial; nonetheless,
it appears there may have been some ambiguity between the
applicant and the individual that was responsible for conducting
the test. In this respect, we note this individual was a
subordinate member of the applicants unit and prior to the
contested FA, the applicant had issued him a Letter of Counseling
and a Letter of Reprimand. In view of this, and to preclude any
injustice to the applicant, we recommend that his record be
corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the Fitness
Assessment, dated 17 Nov 11, be removed from the Air Force
Fitness Management System.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-03703 in Executive Session on 11 Jun 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Aug 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 7 Nov 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Dec 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 2 Jan 13, w/atch.
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03703
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03703 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 11 Nov 11 [sic] be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00946
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his Individual Fitness Assessment History, and a letter from his detachment chief. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that his fitness assessment dated 4 May 2011 be declared void and removed from the AFFMS. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Sep 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03388
After completing his FA, he requested his Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM) -re- accomplish an AC measurement. The tester will record this value as the AC measurement. The applicant did not provide his fitness score sheet nor did he provide documentation from the FAC acknowledging the error and an invalidation memorandum from the Unit Commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate the FA. While we note the applicant's stated request to have the entire FA removed, we believe the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04155
Therefore, they recommend the AC component of the FA dated 31 Jul 2012, be updated to reflect "exempt" in AFFMS. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The facts support his assertion that the entire FA should be removed from his record and that he should be granted the opportunity to re-test immediately. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04155
Therefore, they recommend the AC component of the FA dated 31 Jul 2012, be updated to reflect "exempt" in AFFMS. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The facts support his assertion that the entire FA should be removed from his record and that he should be granted the opportunity to re-test immediately. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00042
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00042 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 30 Jun 2010 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). She requested a signed letter from her supervisor; however she did not send it. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03182
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03182 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her fitness assessment (FA) dated 8 June 2012 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05629
She was re-measured a week later by a different FAC member [witnessed by the Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM)], and her measurements were, height (66 inches) and waist (30.5 inches). DPSIM states that the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that would indicate the 5 Sep 12 AC measurement did not comply with the Air Force Instruction. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02592
from the Unit CC; and Atch 1, Para 13 If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results. The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score AC Measurement Rating 2 Aug 2013 82.20 38.00 Satisfactory 15 May 2013 16.50 39.50 Unsatisfactory 6 Nov 2012 83.30 38.50 Satisfactory *24 Oct 2012 0.00 40.00 Unsatisfactory 30 Jul 2012 74.10 39.00 Unsatisfactory *Annotates Contested FA: On 7 Jan 14, a similar request was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02277
On 24 Apr 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 64.40 unsatisfactory due to failure to achieve minimum requirements on the AC. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant submitted; a memorandum from the FAC validating that she in fact asked for a re-tape by another...